<em>Perspective</em>: Multi-shot LLMs are useful for literature summaries, but humans should remain in the loop

· · 来源:tutorial资讯

Earlier this month, Ars retracted the story after it was found to include fake quotes attributed to a real person. The article — a write-up of a viral incident in which an AI agent seemingly published a hit piece about a human engineer named Scott Shambaugh — was initially published on February 13. After Shambaugh pointed out that he’d never said the quotes attributed to him, Ars‘ editor-in-chief Ken Fisher apologized in an editor’s note, in which he confirmed that the piece included “fabricated quotations generated by an AI tool and attributed to a source who did not say them” and characterized the error as a “serious failure of our standards.” He added that, upon further review, the error appeared to be an “isolated incident.” (404 Media first reported on the retraction.)

type=tar,dest=./out.tar — export as a tarball

'It's hard同城约会对此有专业解读

16歲時,她被告知自己無法懷孕生子。

Percentile 90: 763.217 ms | 255.702 ms

创新“新特区”

And was that me saying that or were other people also against it?